|
|
|
Firing Techniques General Various firing
techniques can be used to accomplish a burn objective. The technique chosen must be correlated
closely with burning objectives, fuels, topography, and weather
factors to prevent damage to forest resources. The proper technique to use can change
as these factors change. Atmospheric conditions should be favorable for smoke to rise into the
upper air and away from smoke-sensitive areas such
as highways, airports, and urban areas. |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Residence time is the time it takes the flaming zone to move past a given point. The residence time of heading and backing prescribed fires is often about the same because the deeper flame depth of a heading fire compensates for its faster movement. Generally, backing fires consume more forest floor fuels than do heading fires. The total heat applied to a site may be roughly equal for both heading and backing fires, as long as additional fuels are not involved. This result can be expected even though the fireline intensity of the heading fire would be greater. In a backing fire, the released heat energy is concentrated closer to the ground. |
|
Factors
Associated with Backing Fires:
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Compensation for minor wind direction changes can be made by altering the angle
of strip fire with the base line. Treat major changes in fuel type separately. An
effective method of reducing fire intensity is to use a series of spots or short 1- to
2-foot-long strips instead of a solid line of fire. An added advantage of these short strips or spots
is that driptorches will not have to be
filled as often. Strip-heading fires permit quick ignition and burnout, and provide for
smoke dispersal under optimum conditions. However, higher intensities will occur wherever
lines of fire burn together, increasing the
likelihood of crown scorch. Occasionally, on areas with
light and even fuel distribution, a heading fire may be allowed
to move over the entire area without stripping to better accomplish
the objective(s). This method reduces the number of areas of increased fire intensity
that occur each time two fires burn together. Caution: Be sure the fire will not escape
control. First
set a backing fire along the downwind control line and allow it to burn out. a strip
wide enough to control the heading fire. Factors Associated with
Strip-heading Fires
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
If only
one or two torch people are available, this technique is usually altered to set the ignition lines 45
degrees into the wind. In the Piedmont,
any ignition line that drops perpendicularly off a ridge creates a flanking fire under
no-wind conditions. If several lines are ignited off the end of a ridge or knoll, the pattern looks
like a chevron or maple leaf.
Factors Associated with Flanking Fires:
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Of course, the
closer the spacing, the more merging points you have. You must be aware that a large number of
small fires burning simultaneously can produce the same kind
of explosive convective energy as a single large fire because too much heat energy is
released too rapidly. This situation is discussed more fully under the section on Aerial
Ignition. Rectangular grids with wider
spacing between lines than within a line should not be used initially because such a
pattern may allow the spots along a line to merge into a line of heading fire before running into
the rear of the downwind spots. Once the first
few lines have been ignited and fire behavior has been assessed, intensity can be
regulated to some extent by changing the time between ignition points within a line, the distance
between points, and the distance between lines.
Thus the balancing act between spacing and timing has to be continually adjusted as
fire behavior reacts to both temporal and spatial changes in fuel and weather. Intensity is decreased by widening the interval between
ignition points along a line. If fireline intensity is still too high after doubling this
interval while maintaining a 2-chain distance between lines, firing should be halted. Allow the
area to burn with a backing fire or plow it
out. Although intensity at the head of an individual spot is increased by widening the
distance between lines, the average intensity of the burn as a whole is usually somewhat lower.
Check to see that convergence-zone flame lengths
are within tolerable limits, and that other fire behavior parameters appear satisfactory.
If everything is within prescription, you can increase both between- and within-line distances.
This step will reduce ignition time, and
decrease the number of ignitors used. The number of convergence areas with their
higher intensities will also be decreased. Experience to date shows grids up to
4 chains by 4 chains (one ignition point every 1.6 acres)
can produce excellent results. The time needed to complete the burn can be reduced by
offsetting successive ignition lines by one half of the within-line spacing. The heading fires from
one line will then come up between the
backing fires on the next line. Factors Associated with Point
Source Fires
|
|
Aerial
Ignition When ground ignition techniques are used, the downwind spots will
usually coalesce and burn out before the whole block has been ignited. In contrast,
aerial firing permits ignition of a block to be completed before the downwind spots have burned
out. This does not present a problem at the damp
end of the prescribed burning window when actual fine-fuel moisture is near 20
percent. Rapid ignition of a block reduces both flying time and the time needed to complete the
burn. However, when using aerial ignition techniques
under "traditional" ideal burning conditions for line-backing fires with
actual fine-fuel moisture near 10 percent, rapid ignition of the entire area can result in an increase
in fire intensity to unacceptable levels. You
would then have little recourse except to let the area burn out and hope that damage is
limited to just a loss in overstory growth. |
|
Some
experienced burners start firing early in the day, before the fuel is dry enough to carry fire well.
They reduce the distance between spots within a line to less than
2 chains by 2 chains. The increased number of ignitions creates more heat and helps
dry the surface fuels, especially when a helitorch is used. The distance between spots must be
expanded as the morning progresses and burning
conditions improve. Otherwise, the spots will merge laterally forming lines of heading
fire that get too intense before reaching the next downwind line of ignition points. The distance
between lines can also be increased as
necessary to maintain a square ignition grid. Current aerial ignition
techniques can be separated into two major types: the DAID (Delayed Aerial Ignition Device) or
ping-pong ball system, and the helitorch or flying
driptorch system. The ping-pong ball system utilizes small plastic spheres containing
potassium permanganate. The balls are injected with ethylene glycol and immediately jettisoned
before the chemicals react thermally to produce a
flame that consumes the ball. The dispensing machine can be mounted in small
airplanes or helicopters. The ping-pong ball system works best in continuous fuels or in areas
where a mosaic burn pattern is desired. The
helitorch is simply a giant driptorch and drum of gelled gasoline mounted or slung
under a helicopter. The helitorch is well suited for discontinuous fuels such as those in clearcuts
because this system emits a steady stream of
burning fuel globs. It is very difficult to effectively regulate the spacing between these
fuel globs. At least one gadget that apparently solves this problem is being marketed. Any
helitorch not modified to effectively control the
timing between the globs of burning fuel should be considered a line-firing device. Both types of aerial ignition dramatically reduce the time needed for an area to
burn out. Although roughly the same amount of smoke
is produced, it is emitted over a shorter period and more of it is entrained in the
convection column. Thus, the impact of any adverse air quality effects is much reduced. Factors Associated with Aerial Ignition
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Center and
Circular (Ring) Firing This technique is useful on cutover areas where a hot
fire is needed to reduce or eliminate logging debris prior to seeding or planting. It
works best when winds, if any, are light and variable. This procedure should never be used for
underburning because of the likelihood of severe
tree damage as the flame fronts merge |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Pile and
Windrow Burning The objective of piling logging debris before burning it is to
prolong fire residence time on a restricted area so that larger materials have time to be
consumed. Some areas will contain an unacceptable amount of large, scattered debris that must
be concentrated to ensure consumption. This
material should be piled and not windrowed. Windrowing can reduce site quality by
removing topsoil. Piedmont soils are also susceptible to compaction from the heavy equipment
used, especially during wet weather. Full exposure of
the soil to the sun and rain bakes the top layer. Furthermore, the direct force of
raindrops will clog soil pores and often results in erosion on steep slopes. The area beneath the
windrows is lost to production because the debris
is rarely consumed completely and what remains makes planting difficult or
impossible. Even when windrows contain breaks spaced every couple of chains, they still present
a barrier to firefighting equipment and wildlife. |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Generally, piles
contain less dirt and dry faster. Burning piles can easily be "bumped" to remove any
dirt and pushed in to increase consumption. The whole area
can then be utilized. Keep piles small and minimize the amount of
soil in them so surface water can pass through, and the debris can dry quickly. Always pile when
the ground surface is dry; less soil compaction will
take place, and considerably less soil will end up in the piles. Allow fresh logging
debris to cure first and to dry after rain. Then "shake" the debris while piling to
remove as much soil as possible. If material is
piled while green or wet, the centers of the piles take an exceedingly long time to dry.
Piles that contain little soil and are constructed to allow some air movement will result in a burn
that consumes significantly more of the
debris and produces less smoke. More efficient burning and greater heat output will lift
smoke higher, reducing smoke concentrations near the ground. Burn when the atmosphere is
neutral to slightly unstable, but not unstable enough
to create control problems. |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tractor-mounted ignition devices that help burning fuel penetrate down toward the
center of a pile have also been fabricated.
Factors Associated with File and Windrow Burning:
|