|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Very high temperatures are produced in the flames of burning forest fuels. Fortunately, the hot gases cool rapidly above the flame zone and are back to a few degrees above normal air temperature a short distance from a prescribed fire unless the wind is calm. Adequate wind should be present to help dissipate the heat and slow its rise into the overstory canopy. Wind is also important in cooling crowns heated by radiation from fire. Southern pines generally survive complete crown scorch as long as there is little needle consumption. Severe needle scorch will, however, retard growth for a year or more after damage and, in this weakened state, the trees are more susceptible to drought and beetle attack. |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
In areas
with scenic values, a special effort should be made to keep needle scorch and bark char to a
minimum. Even though pine bark is a good insulator, cambial
damage can occur from the extended smoldering of duff around the root collar. Such
damage is especially likely in previously unburned, mature trees where a deep organic layer has
accumulated. Whenever heat penetrates into the soil,
feeder roots and beneficial soil organisms are likely to be killed. Damaged pines are
more susceptible to bark beetle attack, especially if adverse weather conditions (e.g. drought)
after the burn compound any loss in tree vigor.
However, many observers report less insect damage in stands that undergo periodic
prescribed burns than in stands where fire has been excluded. Prescribed fire generally is not
used in the management of hardwoods intended for
harvest once a stand is established. Fire may not kill large-diameter hardwoods
outright, but it will often leave fire scars. Such scars render the lower portion of the bole
unmerchantable and provide entry to insects and disease.
Many benefits from prescribed fire, such as reduced hardwood competition, increased
forage for grazing, and improved conditions for wildlife, depend on changes in the vegetation.
Unwise use of fire may also alter species
composition, but with adverse results, particularly when relying on natural
regeneration. |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
When duff layers
are not completely consumed, changes in soil pore space and infiltration rate are very slight. If
mineral soil is repeatedly exposed, rain impact may clog
fine pores with soil and carbon particles, decreasing infiltration rates and aeration of
the soil. A major concern of the forest manager is how fires affect surface runoff and soil
erosion. On most Lower and Middle Coastal Plain
sites, there is little danger of erosion. In the steeper topography of the Upper Coastal
Plain and Piedmont, some soil movement is possible. However, if the burn is under a timber
stand and some duff remains, soil movement will be
minor on slopes up to 25 percent. The amount of soil movement will be greater after
site preparation with heavy machinery than after prescribed burning. Care must be taken
when clearcut logging slash is burned on steep slopes.
Until grass and other vegetation cover the site, surface runoff and soil erosion may
occur. The burning phase of the "fell and burn" site-preparation technique commonly used in the
upper Piedmont and mountains should be completed
by mid-September. This timing allows herbaceous plants to seed in and provide a
winter ground cover. Burning should not be done if exposure of highly erosive soils is
likely. Soil should be wet or damp at the time of burning to
ensure that an organic layer will remain after a prescribed burn. Moisture not only
protects the duff layer adjacent to the soil, but also prevents the fire from consuming soil humus.
If the forest floor is completely consumed, the
microenvironment of the upper soil layer will be drastically changed, making
conditions for near-surface tree roots very inhospitable. Damp soil also aids mopup after the
burn. |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Rainwater leaches minerals out of the ash and into the soil. In sandy soils, leaching may also move mineral through the soil layer into the ground water. Generally, a properly planned prescribed burn will not adversely affect either the quality or quantity ground or surface water in the South. |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Particulates, however, are of special concern to the prescribed burner because they
reduce visibility. The amount of particulate put into the air depends on amount
and type of fuel consumed, fuel moisture content, and rate of fire spread as determined
by timing and type of firing technique used. Rate of smoke dispersal depends mainly on
atmospheric stability and windspeed. Effects of
smoke can be managed by burning on days when smoke will blow away from
smoke-sensitive-areas. Precautions must be taken when burning near populated areas, highways,
airports, and other smoke-sensitive areas. Weather and smoke
management forecasts are available as a guide for windspeed and direction. Any smoke
impact downwind must be considered before lighting the fire. The burner may
be liable if accidents occur as a result of the smoke.
All burning should be done in accordance with applicable smoke management
guidelines and regulations. During a regional alert when high pollution potential exists, all
prescribed burning should be postponed. |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
More complete mopup following daytime burning and nighttime burning only under very stringent prescriptions can minimize the occurrence of these problems. Your local State forestry office can help with planning nighttime burns. |
|
Effects on
Human Health and Welfare Occasional brief exposure of the general public
to low
concentrations of drift smoke is more a temporary inconvenience than a health
problem. High smoke concentrations can, however, be a very serious matter, particularly near
homes of people with respiratory illnesses or near
health-care facilities. Smoke can have negative short-and long-term health effects.
Fire management personnel who are exposed to high smoke concentrations often suffer eye and
respiratory system irritation. Under some
circumstances, continued exposure to high concentrations of carbon monoxide at the
combustion zone can result in impaired alertness and judgment. The probability of this
happening on a prescribed fire is, however, virtually
nonexistent. Over 90 percent of the particulate emissions from prescribed fire are
small enough to enter the human respiratory system. These particulates can contain hundreds of
chemical compounds, some of which are toxic. The
repeated, lengthy exposure to relatively low smoke concentrations over many years can
contribute to respiratory problems and cancer. But, the risk of developing cancer from exposure
to prescribed fire has been estimated to be less
than 1 in a million. Although the use of herbicides in forest management has
increased all chemicals are now tested before being approved for use, and we are more careful
than ever to minimize their potential danger. Many of them
break down rapidly after being applied. Moreover, both theoretical calculations and
field studies suggest that prescribed fires are hot enough to destroy any chemical residues.
Minute quantities that may end up in smoke are well
within currently-accepted air quality standards. Threshold limit values (TLV's) are
often used to measure the safety of herbicide residues in smoke. Expected exposure rates of
workers to various brown-and-burn combinations have
been compared with TLV's. They showed virtually no potential for harm to workers or
the general public. There is at least one group of compounds carried in smoke that can have
an immediate acute impact on individuals. When
noxious plants such as poison ivy burn, the smoke can cause skin rashes. These rashes
can be much more widespread on the body than those caused by direct contact with the plants. If
you breathe this smoke, your respiratory system
can also be affected. |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
The deleterious
effects of prescribed fire on wildlife can include destruction of nesting sites and possible killing
of birds, reptiles, or mammals trapped in the fire.
Fortunately, prescribed fires can be planned for times when nests are not being used.
Also, virtually all the types of prescribed fire used in the South provide ample escape routes for
wildlife. For example, a large tract was
operationally burned with aerially-ignited spot fires and immediately examined for
wildlife mortality. Fish and game agency personnel found none, but noted deer moving back into
the still-smoking burn. The ill-advised practice of
lighting all sides of a burn area (ring firing) is a primary cause of animal entrapment
and has no place in under-burning. It also results in unnecessary tree damage as the flame fronts
merge in the interior of the area.
Management of the endangered redcockaded woodpecker presents a special problem
because of the copious amounts of dried resin that stretch from the nest cavity toward the ground.
The bird requires habitat historically maintained by
fire, even though these pitch flows can be ignited, carrying fire up to the cavity. This is
unlikely, however, if short flame lengths are prescribed. Fuel can also be raked from around
cavity trees as an added precaution.
Prescribed fire does not benefit fish habitat, but it can have adverse effects. Riparian
zone (streamside) vegetation must be excluded from prescribed burns to protect high quality
plant and animal habitat, and water quality. When
shade is removed, water temperatures will increase. Burning conditions are often
unfavorable along streams because of increasing fuel moisture, making line plowing optional.
But a buffer zone should always be left. If in doubt, a
control line should be put in. |
|
Effects on
Aesthetics
The principal effect of prescribed burning on aesthetics can be summarized in one
word: contrast. Contrast, or change from the preburn landscape, may be positive
or negative depending largely on personal opinion. What
may be judged an improvement in scenic beauty by one may be considered undesirable
by another. Many of the undesirable impacts are relatively short term and can be minimized
by considering scenic qualities when planning a burn.
For example, the increased turbulence and updrafts along roads and other forest
openings will cause more intense fire with resulting higher tree trunk char and needle scorch.
Generally, the more immediate unfavorable impacts such
as smoke and ash, topkilled understory plants, and a blackened forest floor are
necessary to achieve two major benefits - increased visual variety and increased visual
penetration. |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Some important points are: 1) The apparent size of a burn can be reduce by leaving unburned islands to create a mosaic pattern of burned and unburned area. 2) Where hardwood in clusions are retained, make sure they are large enough to be relevant to the observer. 3) Observer criteria understood if reactions to a burn are to be predicted. Personal reactions will depend on observer distance, duration or viewing time, and aspect. |
|
|